Nanotechnology for Clean and Safe Water: A Detailed Review

Nanotechnology for Clean and Safe Water: A Detailed Review

Article Type: Review Article

Authors:

Mohammed Syeed

Affiliation: Department of Chemistry National ,Egyptian University, Giza, Egypt.

Corresponding Email: syeedmohammed07@gmail.com

Article review details:

Reviewed By Dr. Mona Ahmed
Reviewed By Dr. Yasin Khan
Final Recommendation By Prof. Raghav

Abstract:

Access to clean and safe water is critical for human health and sustainable development, yet it remains a global challenge due to increasing industrialization, population growth, and pollution. Conventional treatment technologies often fail to remove emerging contaminants such as pharmaceuticals, endocrine disruptors, and resistant pathogens. Nanotechnology offers innovative, efficient, and versatile solutions for water purification through materials with unique properties at the nanoscale. This comprehensive review presents recent advances in nanotechnology-enabled water treatment, including nanomaterial types, purification mechanisms, performance data, challenges, and future perspectives.

Keywords: Nanotechnology; water purification; nanomaterials; adsorption; photocatalysis; nanofiltration; heavy metals; emerging contaminants.

Introduction

Water scarcity and pollution threaten the health of billions globally. Reports from the World Health Organization (WHO) estimate that over 2 billion people consume water contaminated with pathogens or hazardous chemicals, resulting in more than 485,000 diarrheal deaths annually. Traditional water treatment methods—filtration, coagulation, flocculation, and disinfection—face limitations in effectively removing micro-pollutants, heavy metals, and emerging contaminants such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

Nanotechnology involves engineering materials with structures between 1–100 nm, resulting in high specific surface area, enhanced reactivity, and unique physicochemical properties. These characteristics make nanomaterials promising for water purification, offering multifunctional capabilities such as adsorption, catalytic degradation, and antimicrobial action. However, understanding their performance, mechanisms, and potential environmental implications is essential for safe, effective implementation.

2. Materials

2.1 Nanomaterials

  • Carbon-Based Nanomaterials: Graphene oxide (GO) with >500 m²/g surface area; carbon nanotubes (CNTs) with high mechanical strength.
  • Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles: TiO₂ nanoparticles (~10–30 nm) for photocatalysis; Ag nanoparticles (10–50 nm) for antimicrobial activity; ZnO for UV-activated degradation.
  • Magnetic Nanoparticles: Fe₃O₄ for magnetic separation post-treatment.
  • Polymeric Nanocomposites: PVDF, polysulfone, or polyethersulfone membranes modified with nanoparticles.
  • Green Nanomaterials: Biochar nanoparticles synthesized via pyrolysis of agricultural waste, functionalized with amine or carboxyl groups.

2.2 Supporting Chemicals and Standards

  • Analytical-grade acids and bases for pH adjustment.
  • Organic contaminants: dyes (methylene blue, rhodamine B), antibiotics (ciprofloxacin), and hormones (estradiol) for degradation studies.
  • Heavy metals: Standard Pb(NO₃)₂, CdCl₂, and As₂O₃ solutions.

2.3 Water Samples

  • Synthetic wastewaters spiked with known contaminant concentrations.
  • Real samples from textile effluents, pharmaceutical industry discharge, and municipal wastewater.

3. Methods

3.1 Synthesis Techniques

  • Sol-Gel for TiO₂ nanoparticles with narrow size distribution.
  • Hydrothermal Method for crystalline ZnO nanorods.
  • CVD for CNTs with high purity.
  • Green Synthesis using plant extracts like neem or tea for Ag nanoparticles.

3.2 Characterization

  • SEM/TEM for morphology; XRD for crystallinity; FTIR for surface chemistry; BET for specific surface area; zeta potential for surface charge stability.

3.3 Experimental Studies

  • Batch Adsorption Tests: Varying pH, contact time, adsorbent dose, and initial contaminant concentration.
  • Kinetics and Isotherms: Pseudo-second-order kinetics; Langmuir monolayer adsorption capacity.
  • Photocatalytic Tests: Degradation under UV/visible light; measurement of intermediate products via HPLC/GC-MS.
  • Membrane Filtration: Permeate flux, pollutant rejection (%), fouling resistance, and cleaning cycles.

3.4 Analytical Quantification

  • Heavy metals: ICP-MS with detection limits in ppb range.
  • Organic contaminants: UV-Vis (200–800 nm), HPLC with diode array detector.
  • Pathogens: Total coliform and E. coli counts on selective media.

4. Results

Key findings from reviewed studies highlight exceptional performance of nanomaterials for different pollutants:

  • Heavy Metals: GO achieved 99% Pb²⁺ removal at pH 6 with maximum adsorption capacity of 250 mg/g.
  • Organic Pollutants: TiO₂ reduced >95% of methylene blue concentration (10 mg/L) within 60 minutes under UV light (365 nm).
  • Antimicrobial Effectiveness: AgNP-coated membranes achieved 6-log reduction (>99.9999%) of E. coli within 30 minutes of filtration.
  • Combined Pollutant Removal: Fe₃O₄/GO nanocomposites removed arsenic and degraded pesticides simultaneously in simulated groundwater.

Table 1. Example Heavy Metal Adsorption Efficiencies Using Nanomaterials

NanomaterialContaminantMax. Capacity (mg/g)Removal Efficiency (%)Optimal pH
Graphene oxide (GO)Pb²⁺250996
MWCNTsCd²⁺150957
Fe₃O₄ nanoparticlesAs³⁺120926.5

Table 2. Organic Pollutant Degradation by Photocatalytic Nanomaterials

NanomaterialPollutantLight SourceDegradation (%)Time (min)
TiO₂Methylene blueUV (365 nm)9660
ZnOCarbamazepineVisible8890
TiO₂/AgAtrazineUV-Vis9475

5. Discussion

The compiled results demonstrate the superior performance of nanomaterials for removing a wide range of pollutants. Carbon-based nanomaterials, particularly GO and CNTs, provide large adsorption capacities for heavy metals due to their high surface area and surface functional groups. Photocatalytic nanomaterials like TiO₂ and ZnO efficiently degrade organic pollutants through generation of reactive oxygen species.

However, practical implementation challenges include:

  • Nanoparticle aggregation, reducing surface area in real waters.
  • Interference from natural organic matter or competing ions.
  • Potential release of nanoparticles, posing ecotoxicological risks.
  • Higher costs of synthesis and regeneration compared to conventional adsorbents.

Future studies should explore:

  • Hybrid systems integrating nanomaterials with solar energy or bio-based treatments.
  • Long-term stability and regeneration efficiency of nanomaterials.
  • Comprehensive risk assessments and safe-by-design approaches.

6. Conclusion

Nanotechnology provides transformative opportunities to address persistent water contaminants that conventional methods struggle to eliminate. Its multifunctionality, rapid kinetics, and adaptability to diverse pollutants are unmatched. Nonetheless, concerns over environmental safety, production costs, and regulatory gaps must be resolved before nanotechnology can become a mainstream solution for global water treatment. Multidisciplinary collaboration among scientists, engineers, policymakers, and industry will be vital in advancing safe and sustainable nanotechnologies for clean water.

7 References

  1. Qu, X., Alvarez, P. J., & Li, Q. (2013). Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment. Water Research, 47(12), 3931-3946.
  2. Ali, I., & Gupta, V. K. (2006). Advances in water treatment by adsorption technology. Nature Protocols, 1(6), 2661-2667.
  3. Wang, J., & Wang, S. (2019). Removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) from wastewater: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 237, 127-150.
  4. Zhang, X., Chen, Z., & Cheng, Z. (2021). Recent advances in carbon-based nanomaterials for water treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal, 420, 127643.
  5. Theron, J., Walker, J. A., & Cloete, T. E. (2008). Nanotechnology and water treatment: applications and emerging opportunities. Critical Reviews in Microbiology, 34(1), 43-69.
  6. Liu, H., Lv, M., Deng, B., et al. (2011). Preparation of graphene-based nanomaterials and their applications in water treatment. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(17), 7310-7316.
  7. Diallo, M. S., Fromer, N. A., Jhon, M. S., & Kim, D. S. (2009). Nanotechnology for clean water: facts and perspectives. Nanotechnology, 20(39), 392002.
  8. Khin, M. M., Nair, A. S., Babu, V. J., Murugan, R., & Ramakrishna, S. (2012). A review on nanomaterials for environmental remediation. Energy & Environmental Science, 5(8), 8075-8109.
  9. Savage, N., & Diallo, M. S. (2005). Nanomaterials and water purification: opportunities and challenges. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7(4), 331-342.
  10. Gottschalk, F., Sun, T., & Nowack, B. (2013). Environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials: review of modeling and analytical studies. Environmental Pollution, 181, 287-300.
  11. Chong, M. N., Jin, B., Chow, C. W., & Saint, C. (2010). Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: a review. Water Research, 44(10), 2997-3027.
  12. Gupta, V. K., & Saleh, T. A. (2013). Sorption of pollutants by porous carbon, carbon nanotubes and fullerene—An overview. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 20(5), 2828-2843.
  13. Najafpoor, A. A., Davoudi, M., & Dehghani, M. H. (2017). Removal of arsenic from drinking water by adsorption using iron oxide-coated carbon nanotubes. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 15(1), 1-8.
  14. Kang, S., Pinault, M., Pfefferle, L. D., & Elimelech, M. (2007). Single-walled carbon nanotubes exhibit strong antimicrobial activity. Langmuir, 23(17), 8670-8673.
  15. Bora, T., Kyaw, H. H., Pal, S. K., & Dutta, J. (2013). Highly efficient ZnO/Au nanohybrid for photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange. Nanoscale, 5(14), 6298-6304.
  16. Singh, J., Dutta, T., Kim, K. H., Rawat, M., Samddar, P., & Kumar, P. (2018). Green synthesis of metals and their oxide nanoparticles: applications for environmental remediation. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 16(1), 1-24.
  17. Li, H., Zhang, D., Han, X., & Lu, Y. (2014). Magnetic nanoparticles for wastewater treatment: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 12, 325-341.
  18. Lee, J., Kim, J., & Hyeon, T. (2006). Recent progress in the synthesis of porous carbon materials. Advanced Materials, 18(16), 2073-2094.
  19. Mohan, D., & Pittman, C. U. (2007). Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—A critical review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 142(1-2), 1-53.
  20. Kumar, S., Shukla, A., Parmar, P., & Kumar, A. (2019). Graphene-based nanomaterials for removal of pollutants from water: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 17, 1297-1318.
  21. Sires, I., & Brillas, E. (2012). Remediation of water pollution using electrochemical techniques. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry, 1(1), 45-53.
  22. Ahmed, M. B., Zhou, J. L., Ngo, H. H., & Guo, W. (2015). Adsorptive removal of antibiotics from water and wastewater: progress and challenges. Science of the Total Environment, 532, 112-126.
  23. Wei, W., Cui, X., Chen, W., & Ivey, D. G. (2011). Manganese oxide-based materials as electrochemical supercapacitor electrodes. Chemical Society Reviews, 40(3), 1697-1721.
  24. Xie, Y., & Guo, B. (2021). Biochar-supported metal nanoparticles: a new strategy for water pollutant removal. Environmental Science: Nano, 8(3), 667-690.
  25. Fatima, N., & Ahmad, A. (2018). Nanomaterials: a promising tool for wastewater treatment. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 11, 243-256.
  26. Wang, S., & Peng, Y. (2010). Natural zeolites as effective adsorbents in water and wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal, 156(1), 11-24.
  27. Zhang, X., Lei, L., & Zhang, W. X. (2022). Recent progress in iron-based nanomaterials for water purification. Chemosphere, 292, 133456.
  28. Zhang, H., & Chen, G. (2009). Nanoparticles in pollution trace detection and environmental improvement. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 21(6), 713-719.
  29. Jain, R., & Mathur, M. (2017). Removal of toxic heavy metals using nanomaterials: a review. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management, 8, 112-126.
  30. Sajjadi, B., Chen, W. Y., Raman, A. A., & Ibrahim, S. (2016). Application of graphene-based nanomaterials in water purification: A review. Chemosphere, 161, 221-235.
7 Views
Views: 7